linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ep93xx: clock: Fix off by one in ep93xx_div_recalc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a1ceab99-f26c-4edb-8f72-12abf20eec9f@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:54:28 +0000
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Nikita Shubin" <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>,
 "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
 "Alexander Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>
Cc: "Hartley Sweeten" <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
 "Russell King" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ep93xx: clock: Fix off by one in ep93xx_div_recalc_rate()

On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, at 08:14, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> Hi Dan!
>
> Reviewed-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
>
> Alexander, Arnd
>
> unfortunately, the ep93xx DT conversion series is also affected by this
> bug.

Here is what I did now:

1. applied Dan's patch on a new branch
2. applied the DT conversion series on top of that,
   removing that file.
3. applied the first patch (with minor context changes)
   in drivers/clk/clk-ep93xx.c again, along with
   the MODULE_LICENSE fix I did.
4. finally, merged the entire branch into my for-next
   branch so it actually makes it into linux-next

My plan now is to keep the branch in linux-next for at
least a week and send all the other pull requests for
the merge window first. If no other problems show up
(either with this branch or my other 6.12 contents),
I hope to send it all later in the merge window. If
something goes wrong, I'll send only the bugfix as part
of my first fixes branch for 6.12 and we'll defer the
DT conversion once more.

I should have merged it earlier, but wasn't sure about
interdependencies with the parts that already got merged
elsewhere and with the comments about DTC warnings.

>From what I can tell, the current state is as good as
it gets, as we'll always get more comments or conflicts
with new reversions of the series. Let's hope we can
address any other issues on top of what I've merged
now and stop rebasing.

    Arnd