lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <246de2986dce9d867894bb006a1b2b3601e94a4e.camel@maquefel.me>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:14:23 +0300
From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Alexander Sverdlin
	 <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>, Russell King
	 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ep93xx: clock: Fix off by one in
 ep93xx_div_recalc_rate()

Hi Dan!

Reviewed-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>

Alexander, Arnd

unfortunately, the ep93xx DT conversion series is also affected by this
bug.

On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 10:39 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The psc->div[] array has psc->num_div elements.  These values come
> from
> when we call clk_hw_register_div().  It's adc_divisors and
> ARRAY_SIZE(adc_divisors)) and so on.  So this condition needs to be
> >=
> instead of > to prevent an out of bounds read.
> 
> Fixes: 9645ccc7bd7a ("ep93xx: clock: convert in-place to COMMON_CLK")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-
> ep93xx/clock.c
> index 85a496ddc619..e9f72a529b50 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
> @@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static unsigned long
> ep93xx_div_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>         u32 val = __raw_readl(psc->reg);
>         u8 index = (val & psc->mask) >> psc->shift;
>  
> -       if (index > psc->num_div)
> +       if (index >= psc->num_div)
>                 return 0;
>  
>         return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(parent_rate, psc->div[index]);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ