linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf cs-etm: Don't flush when packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1e55f148-37d8-4fbe-b863-d604fdfaafaf@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:14:46 +0100
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
 gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
 scclevenger@...amperecomputing.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Mike Leach
 <mike.leach@...aro.org>, John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
 Ben Gainey <ben.gainey@....com>, Ruidong Tian
 <tianruidong@...ux.alibaba.com>, Benjamin Gray <bgray@...ux.ibm.com>,
 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf cs-etm: Don't flush when packet_queue fills up



On 9/10/2024 9:28 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
> On 9/5/2024 11:50 AM, James Clark wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> cs_etm__flush(), like cs_etm__sample() is an operation that generates a
>> sample and then swaps the current with the previous packet. Calling
>> flush after processing the queues results in two swaps which corrupts
>> the next sample. Therefore it wasn't appropriate to call flush here so
>> remove it.
> 
> In the cs_etm__sample(), if the period is not overflow, it is not necessarily
> to generate instruction samples and copy back stack entries. This is why we
> want to call cs_etm__flush() to make sure the last packet can be recorded
> properly for instruction sample with back stacks.
> 
> We also need to take account into the case for the end of the session - in
> this case we need to generate samples for the last packet for complete info.
> 
> I am wandering should we remove the cs_etm__packet_swap() from cs_etm__sample()?

Sorry for typo. I meant to remove the cs_etm__packet_swap() from cs_etm__flush().

Thanks,
Leo