linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethtool: phy: Check the req

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240911103744.251b0246@fedora.home>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:37:44 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy
 <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit
 <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
 Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>, Jesse Brandeburg
 <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Marek Behún
 <kabel@...nel.org>, Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>,
 Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Nicolò Veronese
 <nicveronese@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
 mwojtas@...omium.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Antoine Tenart
 <atenart@...nel.org>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Dan Carpenter
 <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethtool: phy: Check the req_info.pdn
 field for GET commands

Hi,

On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:33:22 +0200
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> wrote:


> Sorry for asking that, but I missed the report from this current patch,
> as well as the one you're referring to. I've looked-up the netdev
> archive and the syzbot web interface [1] and found no reports for both
> issues. I am clearly not looking at the right place, and/or I probably
> need to open my eyes a bit more.

Heh my bad, I just received the report in question. Looks like you are
getting these before I do :)

Thanks,

Maxime