[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuMKUnY58Blm7UX-@surfacebook.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:35:46 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 08/12] i2c: isch: Use read_poll_timeout()
Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:29:38AM +0200, Andi Shyti kirjoitti:
...
> > - sch_io_wr8(priv, SMBHSTSTS, temp);
> > + sch_io_wr8(priv, SMBHSTSTS, temp & 0x0f);
>
> there is still a dev_dbg() using temp. To be on the safe side, do
> we want to do a "temp &= 0x0f" after the read_poll_timeout?
Isn't it even better that we have more information in the debug output?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists