[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <693e5874-30bb-4076-910b-feb6488e7d85@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:17:58 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@...ahoo.com>, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: thermal: Use strscpy() instead of strcpy()
Le 12/09/2024 à 22:59, Abdul Rahim a écrit :
> thermal: prefer strscpy() over strcpy()
>
> strcpy() is generally considered unsafe and use of strscpy() is
> recommended [1]
>
> this fixes checkpatch warning:
> WARNING: Prefer strscpy over strcpy
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strcpy [1]
> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@...ahoo.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> index 78db38c7076e..a35e40976763 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> @@ -796,9 +796,9 @@ static int acpi_thermal_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> tz->device = device;
> - strcpy(tz->name, device->pnp.bus_id);
> - strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_THERMAL_DEVICE_NAME);
> - strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_THERMAL_CLASS);
> + strscpy(tz->name, device->pnp.bus_id);
> + strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_THERMAL_DEVICE_NAME, MAX_ACPI_DEVICE_NAME_LEN);
Why the 3 parameters version here only?
Is it needed?
CJ
> + strscpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_THERMAL_CLASS);
> device->driver_data = tz;
>
> acpi_thermal_aml_dependency_fix(tz);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists