[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40dc7c1a-9f27-45a3-ad8d-0e9989894574@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:32:39 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"Bartosz
Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
<quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SA8775P camera clock
controller
On 9/6/2024 5:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/08/2024 20:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:01:45PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>> Add device tree bindings for the camera clock controller
>>> on Qualcomm SA8775P platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Un-reviewed.
>
> We achieved consensus allowing sa8775p to stay, but now Qualcomm changes
> point of view and insists on new approach of dropping sa8775p. Therefore
> this change does not make much sense in the new approach.
>
Krzysztof could you please re-review the patches again? As I understand
the that Qualcomm will support both SA8775p and QCS9100 in Kernel.
There’s no plan to drop SA8775p support. These two SoCs will keep
compatible.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists