linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SA8775P display clock controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52d2ee37-5a83-4ca2-902c-8e48b63b93b3@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:35:37 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette
	<mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        "Bartosz
 Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SA8775P display
 clock controllers



On 9/6/2024 5:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/08/2024 20:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:01:47PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>> Add device tree bindings for the display clock controllers
>>> on Qualcomm SA8775P platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/clock/qcom,sa8775p-dispcc.yaml        | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sa8775p-dispcc.h    | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 
> Un-reviewed.
> 
> We achieved consensus allowing sa8775p to stay, but now Qualcomm changes
> point of view and insists on new approach of dropping sa8775p. Therefore
> this change does not make much sense in the new approach.
> 

Krzysztof could you please re-review the patches again? As I understand 
that Qualcomm will support both SA8775p and QCS9100 in Kernel. There’s 
no plan to drop SA8775p support. These two SoCs will keep compatible.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.