[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09dcc7c8-8ac7-4931-be73-f4aa767dd5e9@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 15:00:40 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
<quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SA8775P camera clock
controller
On 9/13/2024 10:32 AM, Taniya Das wrote:
>
>
> On 9/6/2024 5:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/08/2024 20:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:01:45PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>> Add device tree bindings for the camera clock controller
>>>> on Qualcomm SA8775P platform.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Un-reviewed.
>>
>> We achieved consensus allowing sa8775p to stay, but now Qualcomm changes
>> point of view and insists on new approach of dropping sa8775p. Therefore
>> this change does not make much sense in the new approach.
>>
>
> Krzysztof could you please re-review the patches again? As I understand
> the that Qualcomm will support both SA8775p and QCS9100 in Kernel.
> There’s no plan to drop SA8775p support. These two SoCs will keep
> compatible.
>
Krzysztof, Could you please help reviewing the patches again?
--
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists