[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bk0s588m.fsf@geanix.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:21:45 +0200
From: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Dong
Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, Linus
Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: imx: Allow user to disable pinctrl
Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net> writes:
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 12:23:53PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> Making pinctrl drivers and subsequently the pinctrl framework
>> user-controllable, allows building a kernel without this.
>> While in many (most) cases, this could make the system unbootable, it
>> does allow building smaller kernels for those situations where picntrl
>> is not needed.
>>
>> One such situation is when building a kernel for NXP LS1021A systems,
>> which does not have run-time controllable pinctrl, so pinctrl framework
>> and drivers are 100% dead-weight.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
>
> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Was this only for this patch 1/3, or the whole series?
/Esben
Powered by blists - more mailing lists