[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaW14PgLXTRPHUjaLNKfCMRs+hpHrYyMiNaqSs+m0rhqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:45:32 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: imx: Allow user to disable pinctrl
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:24 PM Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com> wrote:
> Making pinctrl drivers and subsequently the pinctrl framework
> user-controllable, allows building a kernel without this.
> While in many (most) cases, this could make the system unbootable, it
> does allow building smaller kernels for those situations where picntrl
> is not needed.
>
> One such situation is when building a kernel for NXP LS1021A systems,
> which does not have run-time controllable pinctrl, so pinctrl framework
> and drivers are 100% dead-weight.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
I guess this needs to be merged through the SoC tree.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists