[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZuQF_w7G1A90tYG3@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:29:35 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: Rijo Thomas <Rijo-john.Thomas@....com>,
Devaraj Rangasamy <Devaraj.Rangasamy@....com>,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] tee: amdtee: Use %pUl printk() format specifier
to print GUIDs
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 07:50:08AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Replace the custom approach with the %pUl printk() format specifier.
> > No functional change intended.
> Thanks, the patch looks like a nice simplificatrion.
Thank you for the review.
> Rijo, Devaraj, does this work for you?
Yes, please test, because seems others use uuid_t (UUID BE) for TEE,
but in this driver IIUC it's guid_t (UUID LE).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists