[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95134eee-5000-44d7-8a8b-67a93a86c05a@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 16:30:00 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: light: ltr501: Drop most likely fake ACPI ID
Hi,
On 9/14/24 4:25 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:31:31 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:51:09PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 9/11/24 11:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> The commit in question does not proove that ACPI ID exists.
>>>> Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doint that
>>>> for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI ID.
>>>>
>>>> Googling for LTERxxxx gives no useful results in regard to DSDT.
>>>> Moreover, there is no "LTER" official vendor ID in the registry.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks, patch looks good to me:
>>
>> Have you grepped over your collection of real DSDTs?
>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
> I'll pick these up in the meantime. Applied to the testing
> branch of iio.git.
As mentioned earlier today, at least the LTER0301 ACPI Hardware ID
is real, so please drop this one. The kmx61 patch is fine to keep.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists