[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240914160603.0eab9716@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 16:06:03 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Ilpo
Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: light: ltr501: Drop most likely fake ACPI
ID
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 16:30:00 +0200
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/14/24 4:25 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 12:31:31 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 03:51:09PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 9/11/24 11:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>>> The commit in question does not proove that ACPI ID exists.
> >>>> Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doint that
> >>>> for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI ID.
> >>>>
> >>>> Googling for LTERxxxx gives no useful results in regard to DSDT.
> >>>> Moreover, there is no "LTER" official vendor ID in the registry.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, patch looks good to me:
> >>
> >> Have you grepped over your collection of real DSDTs?
> >>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> >>
> >> Thank you!
> >>
> > I'll pick these up in the meantime. Applied to the testing
> > branch of iio.git.
>
> As mentioned earlier today, at least the LTER0301 ACPI Hardware ID
> is real, so please drop this one. The kmx61 patch is fine to keep.
Done.
Thanks,
J
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists