linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] KVM: x86 pull requests for 6.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABgObfbV0HOAPA-4XjdUR2Q-gduEQhgSdJb1SzDQXd08M_pD+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 16:54:40 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM: x86 pull requests for 6.12

On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 3:13 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> There's a trivial (and amusing) conflict with KVM s390 in the selftests pull
> request (we both added "config" to the .gitignore, within a few days of each
> other, after the goof being around for a good year or more).
>
> Note, the pull requests are relative to v6.11-rc4.  I got a late start, and for
> some reason thought kvm/next would magically end up on rc4 or later.
>
> Note #2, I had a brainfart and put the testcase for verifying KVM's fastpath
> correctly exits to userspace when needed in selftests, whereas the actual KVM
> fix is in misc.  So if you run KVM selftests in the middle of pulling everything,
> expect the debug_regs test to fail.

Pulled all, thanks. Due to combination of being recovering from flu +
preparing to travel I will probably spend not be able to run tests for
a few days, but everything should be okay for the merge window.

Paolo