[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+oJ71ncJOLH_ozyKgO8N0Dq85nvXM00cpOE24wUprXjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:22:19 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Auchter <michael.auchter@...com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: dac: adi,ad56xx: Fix duplicate
compatible strings
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 9:18 AM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 18:44:39 -0500
> "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > adi,ad5686.yaml and adi,ad5696.yaml duplicate all the I2C device
> > compatible strings with the exception of "adi,ad5337r". Since
> > adi,ad5686.yaml references spi-peripheral-props.yaml, drop the I2C
> > devices from it making it only SPI devices. Update the titles to make
> > the distinction clear.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
> Is this an urgent thing, or can it wait for the merge window after next?
> For now I've queued it up for then in my testing branch but can yank it
> out and send it as a fix after rc1 if that is useful.
Sooner would be better. It's now a warning in dtschema main branch.
The issue is not so much the duplication, but that which schema gets
applied is not deterministic.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists