lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1488e936-d906-41d7-ae97-ffdbcc53b08c@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:58:18 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Ze Huang <18771902331@....com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley
 <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
 Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: canaan: Add support for k230 SoC

On 16/09/2024 08:47, Ze Huang wrote:
> Configuration of the K230 is similar to that of the K210. However, in K210,
> the 256 functions for each pin are shared, whereas in K230, multiplex
> functions are different for every pin.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ze Huang <18771902331@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig        |  10 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/Makefile       |   1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k230.c | 674 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 685 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k230.c

...

> +
> +struct k230_pinctrl {
> +	struct pinctrl_desc	pctl;
> +	struct pinctrl_dev	*pctl_dev;
> +	struct regmap		*regmap_base;
> +	void __iomem		*base;
> +	struct k230_pin_group	*groups;
> +	unsigned int		ngroups;
> +	struct k230_pmx_func	*functions;
> +	unsigned int		nfunctions;
> +};
> +
> +static struct regmap_config k230_regmap_config = {

Why is this not a const?

> +	.reg_bits	= 32,
> +	.val_bits	= 32,
> +	.max_register	= 0x100,
> +	.reg_stride	= 4,
> +};
> +
> +static int k230_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +
> +	return info->ngroups;
> +}
> +
> +static const char *k230_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +				       unsigned int selector)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +
> +	return info->groups[selector].name;
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +			       unsigned int selector,
> +			       const unsigned int **pins,
> +			       unsigned int *num_pins)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +
> +	if (selector >= info->ngroups)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	*pins = info->groups[selector].pins;
> +	*num_pins = info->groups[selector].num_pins;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline const struct k230_pmx_func *k230_name_to_funtion(
> +		const struct k230_pinctrl *info, const char *name)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < info->nfunctions; i++) {
> +		if (!strcmp(info->functions[i].name, name))
> +			return &info->functions[i];
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_pinctrl_parse_groups(struct device_node *np,
> +				     struct k230_pin_group *grp,
> +				     struct k230_pinctrl *info,
> +				     unsigned int index)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = info->pctl_dev->dev;
> +	const __be32 *list;
> +	int size, i, ret;
> +
> +	grp->name = np->name;
> +
> +	list = of_get_property(np, "pinmux", &size);
> +	size /= sizeof(*list);
> +
> +	grp->num_pins = size;
> +	grp->pins = devm_kcalloc(dev, grp->num_pins, sizeof(*grp->pins),
> +				 GFP_KERNEL);
> +	grp->data = devm_kcalloc(dev, grp->num_pins, sizeof(*grp->data),
> +				 GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!grp->pins || !grp->data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> +		unsigned int mux_data = be32_to_cpu(*list++);
> +
> +		grp->pins[i] = (mux_data >> 8);
> +		grp->data[i].func = (mux_data & 0xff);
> +
> +		ret = pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config(np, NULL,
> +						      &grp->data[i].configs,
> +						      &grp->data[i].nconfigs);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +

This looks like double free. There is no get in this scope.

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void k230_pinctrl_child_count(struct k230_pinctrl *info,
> +				     struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +		info->nfunctions++;
> +		info->ngroups += of_get_child_count(child);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_pinctrl_parse_functions(struct device_node *np,
> +					struct k230_pinctrl *info,
> +					unsigned int index)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = info->pctl_dev->dev;
> +	struct k230_pmx_func *func;
> +	struct k230_pin_group *grp;
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +	static unsigned int idx, i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	func = &info->functions[index];
> +
> +	func->name = np->name;
> +	func->ngroups = of_get_child_count(np);
> +	if (func->ngroups <= 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	func->groups = devm_kcalloc(dev, func->ngroups,
> +				    sizeof(*func->groups), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	func->group_idx = devm_kcalloc(dev, func->ngroups,
> +				       sizeof(*func->group_idx), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!func->groups || !func->group_idx)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	i = 0;
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +		func->groups[i] = child->name;
> +		func->group_idx[i] = idx;
> +		grp = &info->groups[idx];
> +		idx++;
> +		ret = k230_pinctrl_parse_groups(child, grp, info, i++);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			of_node_put(child);

Use scoped loop instead.

> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_pinctrl_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				 struct k230_pinctrl *info)

Please keep all probe related code next to each other. That's quite
confusing to find probe code far away from the probe().

> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct device_node *child;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	k230_pinctrl_child_count(info, np);
> +
> +	info->functions = devm_kcalloc(dev, info->nfunctions,
> +				       sizeof(*info->functions), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	info->groups = devm_kcalloc(dev, info->ngroups,
> +				    sizeof(*info->groups), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!info->functions || !info->groups)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	i = 0;
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> +		ret = k230_pinctrl_parse_functions(child, info, i++);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to parse function\n");
> +			of_node_put(child);

Use scoped loop instead.

> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct pinctrl_pin_desc k230_pins[] = {

Why is this not a const?

> +	PINCTRL_PIN(0,  "IO0"),  PINCTRL_PIN(1,  "IO1"),  PINCTRL_PIN(2,  "IO2"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(3,  "IO3"),  PINCTRL_PIN(4,  "IO4"),  PINCTRL_PIN(5,  "IO5"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(6,  "IO6"),  PINCTRL_PIN(7,  "IO7"),  PINCTRL_PIN(8,  "IO8"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(9,  "IO9"),  PINCTRL_PIN(10, "IO10"), PINCTRL_PIN(11, "IO11"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(12, "IO12"), PINCTRL_PIN(13, "IO13"), PINCTRL_PIN(14, "IO14"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(15, "IO15"), PINCTRL_PIN(16, "IO16"), PINCTRL_PIN(17, "IO17"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(18, "IO18"), PINCTRL_PIN(19, "IO19"), PINCTRL_PIN(20, "IO20"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(21, "IO21"), PINCTRL_PIN(22, "IO22"), PINCTRL_PIN(23, "IO23"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(24, "IO24"), PINCTRL_PIN(25, "IO25"), PINCTRL_PIN(26, "IO26"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(27, "IO27"), PINCTRL_PIN(28, "IO28"), PINCTRL_PIN(29, "IO29"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(30, "IO30"), PINCTRL_PIN(31, "IO31"), PINCTRL_PIN(32, "IO32"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(33, "IO33"), PINCTRL_PIN(34, "IO34"), PINCTRL_PIN(35, "IO35"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(36, "IO36"), PINCTRL_PIN(37, "IO37"), PINCTRL_PIN(38, "IO38"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(39, "IO39"), PINCTRL_PIN(40, "IO40"), PINCTRL_PIN(41, "IO41"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(42, "IO42"), PINCTRL_PIN(43, "IO43"), PINCTRL_PIN(44, "IO44"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(45, "IO45"), PINCTRL_PIN(46, "IO46"), PINCTRL_PIN(47, "IO47"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(48, "IO48"), PINCTRL_PIN(49, "IO49"), PINCTRL_PIN(50, "IO50"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(51, "IO51"), PINCTRL_PIN(52, "IO52"), PINCTRL_PIN(53, "IO53"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(54, "IO54"), PINCTRL_PIN(55, "IO55"), PINCTRL_PIN(56, "IO56"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(57, "IO57"), PINCTRL_PIN(58, "IO58"), PINCTRL_PIN(59, "IO59"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(60, "IO60"), PINCTRL_PIN(61, "IO61"), PINCTRL_PIN(62, "IO62"),
> +	PINCTRL_PIN(63, "IO63")
> +};
> +
> +static void k230_pinctrl_pin_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +				      struct seq_file *s, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +	u32 val, mode, bias, drive, input, output, slew, schmitt, power;
> +	struct k230_pin_group *grp = k230_pins[offset].drv_data;
> +	static const char * const biasing[] = {
> +			"pull none", "pull down", "pull up", "" };
> +	static const char * const enable[] = {
> +			"disable", "enable" };
> +	static const char * const power_source[] = {
> +			"3V3", "1V8" };
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(info->regmap_base, offset * 4, &val);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(info->pctl_dev->dev,
> +			"failed to read offset 0x%x\n", offset * 4);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	mode	= (val & K230_PC_SEL) >> K230_SHIFT_SEL;
> +	drive	= (val & K230_PC_DS) >> K230_SHIFT_DS;
> +	bias	= (val & K230_PC_BIAS) >> K230_SHIFT_BIAS;
> +	input	= (val & K230_PC_IE) >> K230_SHIFT_IE;
> +	output	= (val & K230_PC_OE) >> K230_SHIFT_OE;
> +	slew	= (val & K230_PC_SL) >> K230_SHIFT_SL;
> +	schmitt	= (val & K230_PC_ST) >> K230_SHIFT_ST;
> +	power	= (val & K230_PC_MSC) >> K230_SHIFT_MSC;
> +
> +	seq_printf(s, "%s - strength %d - %s - %s - slewrate %s - schmitt %s - %s",
> +		   grp ? grp->name : "unknown",
> +		   drive,
> +		   biasing[bias],
> +		   input ? "input" : "output",
> +		   enable[slew],
> +		   enable[schmitt],
> +		   power_source[power]);
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_dt_node_to_map(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +			       struct device_node *np_config,
> +			       struct pinctrl_map **map,
> +			       unsigned int *num_maps)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +	struct device *dev = info->pctl_dev->dev;
> +	const struct k230_pmx_func *func;
> +	const struct k230_pin_group *grp;
> +	struct pinctrl_map *new_map;
> +	int map_num, i, j, idx;
> +	unsigned int grp_id;
> +
> +	func = k230_name_to_funtion(info, np_config->name);
> +	if (!func) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "function %s not found\n", np_config->name);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	map_num = 0;
> +	for (i = 0; i < func->ngroups; ++i) {
> +		grp_id = func->group_idx[i];
> +		/* npins of config map plus a mux map */
> +		map_num += info->groups[grp_id].num_pins + 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	new_map = kcalloc(map_num, sizeof(*new_map), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!new_map)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	*map = new_map;
> +	*num_maps = map_num;
> +
> +	idx = 0;
> +	for (i = 0; i < func->ngroups; ++i) {
> +		grp_id = func->group_idx[i];
> +		grp = &info->groups[grp_id];
> +		new_map[idx].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
> +		new_map[idx].data.mux.group = grp->name;
> +		new_map[idx].data.mux.function = np_config->name;
> +		idx++;
> +
> +		for (j = 0; j < grp->num_pins; ++j) {
> +			new_map[idx].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN;
> +			new_map[idx].data.configs.group_or_pin =
> +				pin_get_name(pctldev, grp->pins[j]);
> +			new_map[idx].data.configs.configs =
> +				grp->data[j].configs;
> +			new_map[idx].data.configs.num_configs =
> +				grp->data[j].nconfigs;
> +			idx++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

...

> +
> +	ret = regmap_write(info->regmap_base, pin * 4, val);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to write offset 0x%x\n", pin * 4);

Isn't regmap an MMIO? If so, drop all of such messages. This just makes
unlikely error paths too big.

> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
> +			    unsigned long *configs, unsigned int num_configs)
> +{
> +	enum pin_config_param param;
> +	unsigned int arg, i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(pin >= K230_NPINS))

Drop WARN_ON. No need to panic kernel. Instead, handle correctly the error.

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
> +		param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
> +		arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
> +		ret = k230_pinconf_set_param(pctldev, pin, param, arg);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void k230_pconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +				struct seq_file *s, unsigned int pin)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(info->regmap_base, pin * 4, &val);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(info->pctl_dev->dev, "failed to read offset 0x%x\n", pin * 4);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	seq_printf(s, " 0x%08x", val);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pinconf_ops k230_pinconf_ops = {
> +	.is_generic		= true,
> +	.pin_config_get		= k230_pinconf_get,
> +	.pin_config_set		= k230_pinconf_set,
> +	.pin_config_dbg_show	= k230_pconf_dbg_show,
> +};
> +
> +static int k230_get_functions_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +
> +	return info->nfunctions;
> +}
> +
> +static const char *k230_get_fname(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> +				  unsigned int selector)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +
> +	return info->functions[selector].name;
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int selector,
> +			   const char * const **groups, unsigned int *num_groups)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +
> +	*groups = info->functions[selector].groups;
> +	*num_groups = info->functions[selector].ngroups;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int k230_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int selector,
> +			unsigned int group)
> +{
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> +	const struct k230_pin_conf *data = info->groups[group].data;
> +	struct k230_pin_group *grp = &info->groups[group];
> +	const unsigned int *pins = grp->pins;
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	unsigned int value, mask;
> +	int cnt, reg;
> +
> +	regmap = info->regmap_base;
> +
> +	for (cnt = 0; cnt < grp->num_pins; cnt++) {
> +		reg = pins[cnt] * 4;
> +		value = data[cnt].func << K230_SHIFT_SEL;
> +		mask = K230_PC_SEL;
> +		regmap_update_bits(regmap, reg, mask, value);
> +		k230_pins[pins[cnt]].drv_data = grp;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pinmux_ops k230_pmxops = {
> +	.get_functions_count	= k230_get_functions_count,
> +	.get_function_name	= k230_get_fname,
> +	.get_function_groups	= k230_get_groups,
> +	.set_mux		= k230_set_mux,
> +	.strict			= true,
> +};
> +
> +static int k230_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct k230_pinctrl *info;
> +	struct pinctrl_desc *pctl;
> +
> +	info = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!info)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pctl = &info->pctl;
> +
> +	pctl->name	= "k230-pinctrl";
> +	pctl->owner	= THIS_MODULE;
> +	pctl->pins	= k230_pins;
> +	pctl->npins	= ARRAY_SIZE(k230_pins);
> +	pctl->pctlops	= &k230_pctrl_ops;
> +	pctl->pmxops	= &k230_pmxops;
> +	pctl->confops	= &k230_pinconf_ops;
> +
> +	info->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(info->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(info->base);
> +
> +	k230_regmap_config.name = "canaan,pinctrl";

Why this is not part of definition?

> +	info->regmap_base = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, info->base,
> +						  &k230_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(info->regmap_base))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(info->regmap_base),
> +				     "failed to init regmap\n");
> +
> +	info->pctl_dev = devm_pinctrl_register(dev, pctl, info);
> +	if (IS_ERR(info->pctl_dev))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(info->pctl_dev),
> +				     "devm_pinctrl_register failed\n");
> +
> +	k230_pinctrl_parse_dt(pdev, info);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id k230_dt_ids[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "canaan,k230-pinctrl", },
> +	{ /* sintenel */ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k230_dt_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver k230_pinctrl_driver = {
> +	.probe = k230_pinctrl_probe,
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "k230-pinctrl",
> +		.of_match_table = k230_dt_ids,
> +	},
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(k230_pinctrl_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ze Huang <18771902331@....com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Canaan K230 pinctrl driver");

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ