[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9a7ebb4-3d7c-403e-b818-29a6a3b12adc@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:28:04 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
<rppt@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/7] mm: Use ptep_get() for accessing PTE entries
On 17.09.24 09:31, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Convert PTE accesses via ptep_get() helper that defaults as READ_ONCE() but
> also provides the platform an opportunity to override when required. This
> stores read page table entry value in a local variable which can be used in
> multiple instances there after. This helps in avoiding multiple memory load
> operations as well possible race conditions.
>
Please make it clearer in the subject+description that this really only
involves set_pte_safe().
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
> Cc: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/pgtable.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> index 2a6a3cccfc36..547eeae8c43f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> @@ -1060,7 +1060,8 @@ static inline int pgd_same(pgd_t pgd_a, pgd_t pgd_b)
> */
> #define set_pte_safe(ptep, pte) \
> ({ \
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(pte_present(*ptep) && !pte_same(*ptep, pte)); \
> + pte_t __old = ptep_get(ptep); \
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(pte_present(__old) && !pte_same(__old, pte)); \
> set_pte(ptep, pte); \
> })
>
I don't think this is necessary. PTE present cannot flip concurrently,
that's the whole reason of the "safe" part after all.
Can we just move these weird set_pte/pmd_safe() stuff to x86 init code
and be done with it? Then it's also clear *where* it is getting used and
for which reason.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists