[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240917230805.gf4sw6phbicysixb@synopsys.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 23:08:10 +0000
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches
<joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
CC: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Selvarasu Ganesan <selvarasu.g@...sung.com>,
"felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com" <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jh0801.jung@...sung.com" <jh0801.jung@...sung.com>,
"dh10.jung@...sung.com" <dh10.jung@...sung.com>,
"naushad@...sung.com" <naushad@...sung.com>,
"akash.m5@...sung.com" <akash.m5@...sung.com>,
"rc93.raju@...sung.com" <rc93.raju@...sung.com>,
"taehyun.cho@...sung.com" <taehyun.cho@...sung.com>,
"hongpooh.kim@...sung.com" <hongpooh.kim@...sung.com>,
"eomji.oh@...sung.com" <eomji.oh@...sung.com>,
"shijie.cai@...sung.com" <shijie.cai@...sung.com>,
stable <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: core: Stop processing of pending events if
controller is halted
++Joe Perches, Dwaipayan Ray
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 05:47:05AM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 11:00:30PM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024, Selvarasu Ganesan wrote:
> > > > > This commit addresses an issue where events were being processed when
> > > > > the controller was in a halted state. To fix this issue by stop
> > > > > processing the events as the event count was considered stale or
> > > > > invalid when the controller was halted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: fc8bb91bc83e ("usb: dwc3: implement runtime PM")
> > > > > Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Checkpatch doesn't like that format. Fix the Cc stable tag to below:
> > > >
> > > > Cc: stable@...nel.org
> > >
> > > What? Why? That should be fine, exactly what is the warning that this
> > > gives? That should be fine, as it's what my scripts put into patches
> > > that I create :)
> > >
> >
> > This is what checkpatch complains:
> >
> > WARNING:BAD_STABLE_ADDRESS_STYLE: Invalid email format for stable: 'stable <stable@...nel.org>', prefer 'stable@...nel.org'
> > #23:
> > Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>
> >
> > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 72 lines checked
>
> Ugh, that's wrong, whatever you want to do here is fine.
>
> Someone should send a patch for checkpatch...
>
I included the maintainer Joe and Dwaipayan base on the below related change:
fccaebf00e60 ("checkpatch: improve email parsing")
Seems checkpatch doesn't like stable address that begins with a name?
Hopefully they can help take a look.
Thanks,
Thinh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists