[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23655990.6Emhk5qWAg@phil>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:13:25 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Tim Lunn <tim@...thertop.org>,
Andy Yan <andyshrk@....com>, Muhammed Efe Cetin <efectn@...tonmail.com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...eble.ai>, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>,
Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>
Cc: Celeste Liu <CoelacanthusHex@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add initial support for Rockchip RK3528 SoC
Hey,
Am Dienstag, 17. September 2024, 22:14:36 CEST schrieb Yao Zi:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 09:27:01AM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
> > Rockchip RK3528 is a quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC designed for
> > multimedia application. This series add a basic device tree with CPU,
> > interrupts and UART nodes for it and is able to boot into a kernel with
> > only UART console.
> >
> > Has been tested on Radxa E20C board[1] with vendor U-boot, successfully
> > booted into initramfs with this log[2].
> Ping on this thread. Is it possible to get this merged in v6.12? Or
> anything else I need to do?
sadly nope. From a timeline point of view things should ideally be in the
Rockchip tree by -rc6 . Which then move to the soc tree and from there
to Linus' tree.
There is this rule that all new development for a -rc1 kernel should be
present in linux-next _before_ the merge-window opens.
The thing we need to figure out for your series is the uart binding,
because that _should_ go through the tree handling serial drivers.
Greg is in your cc list but with the amount of mail he gets, I don't
think he has single-parts of patch series on his radar.
So I guess the easiest way would be to send the uart-binding from patch 1
as a completely separate patch with adapted Cc list, so that it's obvious
this should go through the serial tree.
>From talking with Collabora people today at the Open Source Summit, it
seems that's also their plan for the rk3576 that is stuck at a similar
state.
Hope that helps a bit to explain
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists