[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e94f03a9-92e1-47d5-aa36-fc51216436c9@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:03:03 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>, patrick@...cx.xyz,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Ricky CX Wu <ricky.cx.wu.wiwynn@...il.com>, Joel Stanley
<joel@....id.au>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Noah Wang <noahwang.wang@...look.com>,
Peter Yin <peteryin.openbmc@...il.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: support pmbus
compatible string
On 18/09/2024 11:54, Delphine CC Chiu wrote:
> From: Ricky CX Wu <ricky.cx.wu.wiwynn@...il.com>
>
> Add pmbus compatibale string for the Generic PMbus devices that could
> be monitor by pmbus driver.
>
You need to explain more, provide background why we would like to accept
a generic compatible. And why a specific compatible cannot or should not
be used...
In general this is a no, you cannot have such compatibles for real hardware.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists