[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f76798ea-6edd-4888-8057-c09aaed88f25@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:53:09 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>, patrick@...cx.xyz,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Ricky CX Wu <ricky.cx.wu.wiwynn@...il.com>, Joel Stanley
<joel@....id.au>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
Noah Wang <noahwang.wang@...look.com>, Peter Yin
<peteryin.openbmc@...il.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: support pmbus
compatible string
On 9/18/24 06:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/09/2024 11:54, Delphine CC Chiu wrote:
>> From: Ricky CX Wu <ricky.cx.wu.wiwynn@...il.com>
>>
>> Add pmbus compatibale string for the Generic PMbus devices that could
>> be monitor by pmbus driver.
>>
>
> You need to explain more, provide background why we would like to accept
> a generic compatible. And why a specific compatible cannot or should not
> be used...
>
> In general this is a no, you cannot have such compatibles for real hardware.
>
Agreed; affected chips should be listed explicitly in drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.c.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists