lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53f1cb2aefeb360002cd840cb8997ae3.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 03:35:20 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>
Cc: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: si5341: Prevent division by zero in si5341_output_clk_determine_rate()

Quoting Aleksandr Mishin (2024-09-17 00:52:50)
> In si5341_output_clk_determine_rate() division by zero is possible if the
> following conditions are met:
> - rate > (parent_rate / 2);
> - (parent_rate / 2) is not multiple of rate;
> - CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is not set.
> 
> Add zero value check to prevent division by zero.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Fixes: 61c34af50c5f ("clk: si5341: Switch to determine_rate")

Nope. The problem was there before this commit.

> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c b/drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c
> index 6e8dd7387cfd..d0d68a5bba74 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-si5341.c
> @@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static int si5341_output_clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>         } else {
>                 /* We cannot change our parent's rate, report what we can do */
>                 r /= rate;
> -               rate = req->best_parent_rate / (r << 1);
> +               rate = (r << 1) ? req->best_parent_rate / (r << 1) : 0;

This is too ugly. Also, I assume it would be better to provide a higher
rate if the rate request allows it. Returning 0 should basically never
happen.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ