[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240919124323.GB28725@aspen.lan>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:43:23 +0200
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>,
Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>,
Hervé Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] backlight: led-backlight: add devlink to supplier
LEDs
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 10:53:10AM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> led-backlight is a consumer of one or multiple LED class devices, but no
> devlink is created for such supplier-producer relationship. One consequence
> is that removal ordered is not correctly enforced.
>
> Issues happen for example with the following sections in a device tree
> overlay:
>
> // An LED driver chip
> pca9632@62 {
> compatible = "nxp,pca9632";
> reg = <0x62>;
>
> // ...
>
> addon_led_pwm: led-pwm@3 {
> reg = <3>;
> label = "addon:led:pwm";
> };
> };
>
> backlight-addon {
> compatible = "led-backlight";
> leds = <&addon_led_pwm>;
> brightness-levels = <255>;
> default-brightness-level = <255>;
> };
>
> On removal of the above overlay, the LED driver can be removed before the
> backlight device, resulting in:
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010
> ...
> Call trace:
> led_put+0xe0/0x140
> devm_led_release+0x6c/0x98
This looks like the object became invalid whilst we were holding a reference
to it. Is that reasonable? Put another way, is using devlink here fixing a
bug or merely hiding one?
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists