[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91392141-af8b-4161-8e76-6f461aaba42a@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:44:26 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, geert+renesas@...der.be,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: Add Qualcomm IPQ5424 GCC
On 20/09/2024 13:56, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> + - $ref: qcom,gcc.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + const: qcom,ipq5424-gcc
>>
>> So everything i sthe same as 5332? Why not adding it there?
>>
> infact, ipq5332 has 1 dual lane and 1 single lane pcie, whereas
> ipq5424 has 2 dual lane and 2 single lane pcie. will update the
> bindings in v2 accordingly.
Hm? What is the difference in the bindings? I don't see. Maybe some diff
would help.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists