lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5960412-e498-49be-a906-c29ee597344b@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:57:24 +0530
From: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <catalin.marinas@....com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <geert+renesas@...der.be>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: qcom: add IPQ5424 SoC and rdp466 board
 support



On 9/19/2024 6:00 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[..]

>> +
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b6c08fac9482
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
>> +/*
>> + * IPQ5424 device tree source
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2022-2024 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq5424-gcc.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq5424-gcc.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +
>> +/ {
>> +	#address-cells = <2>;
>> +	#size-cells = <2>;
>> +	interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> +
>> +	clocks {
>> +		xo_board: xo-board-clk {
>> +			compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> +			#clock-cells = <0>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
>> +			compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> +			#clock-cells = <0>;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	cpus: cpus {
>> +		#address-cells = <1>;
>> +		#size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +		CPU0: cpu@0 {
> 
> Lowercase labels please.
> 
> I am in process of fixing it everywhere.
> 
ok

>> +			device_type = "cpu";
>> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>> +			reg = <0x0>;
>> +			enable-method = "psci";
>> +			next-level-cache = <&L2_0>;
>> +			L2_0: l2-cache {
>> +				compatible = "cache";
>> +				cache-level = <2>;
>> +				cache-unified;
>> +				next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> +				L3_0: l3-cache {
>> +					compatible = "cache";
>> +					cache-level = <3>;
>> +					cache-unified;
>> +				};
>> +			};
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		CPU1: cpu@100 {
>> +			device_type = "cpu";
>> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>> +			enable-method = "psci";
>> +			reg = <0x100>;
>> +			next-level-cache = <&L2_100>;
>> +			L2_100: l2-cache {
>> +				compatible = "cache";
>> +				cache-level = <2>;
>> +				cache-unified;
>> +				next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> +			};
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		CPU2: cpu@200 {
>> +			device_type = "cpu";
>> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>> +			enable-method = "psci";
>> +			reg = <0x200>;
>> +			next-level-cache = <&L2_200>;
>> +			L2_200: l2-cache {
>> +				compatible = "cache";
>> +				cache-level = <2>;
>> +				cache-unified;
>> +				next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> +			};
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		CPU3: cpu@300 {
>> +			device_type = "cpu";
>> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
>> +			enable-method = "psci";
>> +			reg = <0x300>;
>> +			next-level-cache = <&L2_300>;
>> +			L2_300: l2-cache {
>> +				compatible = "cache";
>> +				cache-level = <2>;
>> +				cache-unified;
>> +				next-level-cache = <&L3_0>;
>> +			};
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	memory@...00000 {
>> +		device_type = "memory";
>> +		/* We expect the bootloader to fill in the size */
>> +		reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x0>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	pmu {
> 
> pmu-a55
> 
ok

>> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a55-pmu";
>> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	pmu-v7 {
> 
> pmu-a7 but... where is the A7 CPU?
> 
oops, by mistake. Renamed to a55 above, but missed deleting here.

>> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-pmu";
>> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> 
> Same interrupts? Huh?
> 
will be removed.

>> +	};
>> +
>> +	dsu-pmu {
> 
> pmu-dsu?
> 
ok

>> +		compatible = "arm,dsu-pmu";
>> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 50 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>> +		cpus = <&CPU0>, <&CPU1>, <&CPU2>, <&CPU3>;
>> +		status = "okay";
> 
> Drop
> 
ok

>> +	};
>> +
>> +	psci {
>> +		compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
>> +		method = "smc";
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	reserved-memory {
>> +		#address-cells = <2>;
>> +		#size-cells = <2>;
>> +		ranges;
>> +
>> +		tz@...00000 {
>> +			reg = <0x0 0x8a600000 0x0 0x200000>;
>> +			no-map;
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	soc@0 {
>> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
>> +		#address-cells = <2>;
>> +		#size-cells = <2>;
>> +		ranges = <0 0 0 0 0x10 0>;
>> +
>> +		tlmm: pinctrl@...0000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,ipq5424-tlmm";
>> +			reg = <0 0x01000000 0 0x300000>;
>> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 84 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +			gpio-controller;
>> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
>> +			gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 50>;
>> +			interrupt-controller;
>> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> +			uart1_pins: uart1-state {
>> +				pins = "gpio43", "gpio44";
>> +				function = "uart1";
>> +				drive-strength = <8>;
>> +				bias-pull-up;
>> +			};
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		gcc: clock-controller@...0000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,ipq5424-gcc";
>> +			reg = <0 0x01800000 0 0x40000>;
>> +			clocks = <&xo_board>,
>> +				 <&sleep_clk>,
>> +				 <0>,
>> +				 <0>,
>> +				 <0>;
>> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
>> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
>> +			#interconnect-cells = <1>;
>> +		};
>> +
>> +		qupv3: geniqup@...0000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,geni-se-qup";
>> +			reg = <0 0x01ac0000 0 0x2000>;
>> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_AHB_MST_CLK>,
>> +				 <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_AHB_SLV_CLK>;
>> +			clock-names = "m-ahb", "s-ahb";
>> +			ranges;
>> +			#address-cells = <2>;
>> +			#size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> +			status = "okay";
> 
> Please do not upstream your downstream code...
> 
Sure, will remove here and below place

Regards,
  Sricharan

>> +
>> +			uart1: serial@...4000 {
>> +				compatible = "qcom,geni-debug-uart";
>> +				reg = <0 0x01a84000 0 0x4000>;
>> +				clocks = <&gcc GCC_QUPV3_UART1_CLK>;
>> +				clock-names = "se";
>> +				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 340 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +				status = "okay";
> 
> Work on upstream instead.
> 
>> +			};
>> +		};
>> +
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ