| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202409212247.nX8LW3Px-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:13:11 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Steven Davis <goldside000@...look.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Davis <goldside000@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq_work: Improve CPU Responsiveness in irq_work_sync
with cond_resched()
Hi Steven,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.11 next-20240920]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Steven-Davis/irq_work-Improve-CPU-Responsiveness-in-irq_work_sync-with-cond_resched/20240918-232606
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/SJ2P223MB10263844181902531B671FB6F7622%40SJ2P223MB1026.NAMP223.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
patch subject: [PATCH] irq_work: Improve CPU Responsiveness in irq_work_sync with cond_resched()
config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240921/202409212247.nX8LW3Px-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240921/202409212247.nX8LW3Px-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409212247.nX8LW3Px-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/irq_work.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
548 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
561 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/irq_work.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
574 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/irq_work.c:14:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
585 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
595 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
605 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
693 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
701 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
709 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
718 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
727 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
736 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/irq_work.c:312:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
312 | {
| ^
kernel/irq_work.c:317:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
317 | {
| ^
>> kernel/irq_work.c:323:13: error: use of undeclared identifier 'irq_workd_setup'
323 | .setup = irq_workd_setup,
| ^
>> kernel/irq_work.c:325:28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'run_irq_workd'
325 | .thread_fn = run_irq_workd,
| ^
kernel/irq_work.c:330:1: error: function definition is not allowed here
330 | {
| ^
>> kernel/irq_work.c:335:16: error: use of undeclared identifier 'irq_work_init_threads'; did you mean 'irqwork_threads'?
335 | early_initcall(irq_work_init_threads);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| irqwork_threads
include/linux/init.h:289:47: note: expanded from macro 'early_initcall'
289 | #define early_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, early)
| ^
include/linux/init.h:282:54: note: expanded from macro '__define_initcall'
282 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^
include/linux/init.h:280:20: note: expanded from macro '___define_initcall'
280 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^
include/linux/init.h:274:22: note: expanded from macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^
include/linux/init.h:270:41: note: expanded from macro '____define_initcall'
270 | __attribute__((__section__(__sec))) = fn;
| ^
kernel/irq_work.c:321:34: note: 'irqwork_threads' declared here
321 | static struct smp_hotplug_thread irqwork_threads = {
| ^
>> kernel/irq_work.c:335:1: error: initializing 'initcall_t' (aka 'int (*)(void)') with an expression of incompatible type 'struct smp_hotplug_thread'
335 | early_initcall(irq_work_init_threads);
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:289:29: note: expanded from macro 'early_initcall'
289 | #define early_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, early)
| ^ ~~
include/linux/init.h:282:35: note: expanded from macro '__define_initcall'
282 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^ ~~
include/linux/init.h:280:2: note: expanded from macro '___define_initcall'
280 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^ ~~
note: (skipping 3 expansions in backtrace; use -fmacro-backtrace-limit=0 to see all)
include/linux/compiler_types.h:83:23: note: expanded from macro '___PASTE'
83 | #define ___PASTE(a,b) a##b
| ^
<scratch space>:69:1: note: expanded from here
69 | __initcall__kmod_irq_work__193_335_irq_work_init_threadsearly
| ^
include/linux/init.h:269:20: note: expanded from macro '____define_initcall'
269 | static initcall_t __name __used \
| ^
270 | __attribute__((__section__(__sec))) = fn;
| ~~
>> kernel/irq_work.c:335:39: error: expected '}'
335 | early_initcall(irq_work_init_threads);
| ^
kernel/irq_work.c:287:1: note: to match this '{'
287 | {
| ^
12 warnings and 8 errors generated.
vim +312 kernel/irq_work.c
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 310
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 311 static void run_irq_workd(unsigned int cpu)
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 @312 {
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 313 irq_work_run_list(this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list));
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 314 }
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 315
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 316 static void irq_workd_setup(unsigned int cpu)
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 317 {
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 318 sched_set_fifo_low(current);
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 319 }
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 320
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 @321 static struct smp_hotplug_thread irqwork_threads = {
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 322 .store = &irq_workd,
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 @323 .setup = irq_workd_setup,
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 324 .thread_should_run = irq_workd_should_run,
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 @325 .thread_fn = run_irq_workd,
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 326 .thread_comm = "irq_work/%u",
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 327 };
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 328
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 329 static __init int irq_work_init_threads(void)
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 330 {
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 331 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 332 BUG_ON(smpboot_register_percpu_thread(&irqwork_threads));
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 333 return 0;
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 334 }
b4c6f86ec2f648 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-07 @335 early_initcall(irq_work_init_threads);
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists