[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <w36jlnksfym2bwsyxhvk2fs3yxf5xvmfu5j37z5bf2y4kjpbbu@wcy4egrsmefj>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:05:36 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Igor Prusov <ivprusov@...utedevices.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, prusovigor@...il.com, kernel@...utedevices.com,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add bindings for NeoFidelity
NTP8835
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 08:42:33PM +0300, Igor Prusov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:24:33PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 09/07/2024 19:28, Igor Prusov wrote:
> > > Add dt-bindings for NeoFidelity NTP8835C/NTP8835C Amplifiers
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Prusov <ivprusov@...utedevices.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/sound/neofidelity,ntp8835.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > No need for new schema. Just put it - after testing - into previous
> > bindings file.
>
> I am going to add some clocks in next version and there are some
> differences between amplifiers. 8835 uses separate master clock, 8918 is
> clocked by BCLK. Is it still better to use same schema with anyOf, or
> keep them in different files?
No clue, that was 2 months ago so I don't have that email in my inbox at
all.
Please post complete bindings (regardless whether driver implement it or
not), so we can see the differences.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists