linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] MM updates for 6.12-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdU3mfA_SuPqw8ZjkECnP456R=K49fg2yHdOznrSzvTjAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 10:09:28 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MM updates for 6.12-rc1

Hi Linus,

On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 6:35 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Sept 2024 at 02:32, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >     kernel/resource.c: In function ‘gfr_start’:
> >     ./include/linux/minmax.h:93:30: error: conversion from ‘long long
> > unsigned int’ to ‘resource_size_t’ {aka ‘unsigned int’} changes value
> > from ‘18446744073709551615’ to ‘4294967295’ [-Werror=overflow]
> >
> > Due to
> >
> >     #define PHYSMEM_END  (-1ULL)
> >
> > not being correct on 32-bit without LPAE.
>
> Hmm. Can you check if making it be
>
>       #define PHYSMEM_END  ((phys_addr_t)-1)
>
> fixes things for you?

That fixes the warning/error, as expected.

> That said, it would probably be even better if we got rid of these
> games entirely, and m68k just defined MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS instead. Maybe
> as a config option, since I assume it's going to be either 24 or 32
> depending on CPU (or are there other choices? I used to know the old
> m68k, but...)

Indeed, on 68000 and 68008 it could be 24 resp. 20 ;-)
But all systems with a MMU (and even MC68328 without MMU) do support
a 32-bit external address space, so 32 seems fine.

BTW, other 32-bit architectures are suffering from the same issue
(kisskb shows mips, xtensa, parisc, powerpc failures).

BTW2, the following may not work with the default PHYSMEM_END due
to integer overflow, on both 32-bit and 64-bit:

mm/sparse.c:    unsigned long max_sparsemem_pfn = (PHYSMEM_END + 1) >>
PAGE_SHIFT;

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds