[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15cc4380-9ca7-c558-2aaf-7cc845c28854@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:34:55 +0530
From: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <broonie@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>, <esben@...nix.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>,
<quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/8] spi: dt-bindings: Introduce qcom,spi-qpic-snand
On 9/23/2024 2:02 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 05:03:44PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> Document the QPIC-SPI-NAND flash controller present in the IPQ SoCs.
>> It can work both in serial and parallel mode and supports typical
>> SPI-NAND page cache operations.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Change in [v10]
>>
>> * No change
>
> ...
>
>> +title: Qualcomm QPIC NAND controller
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Md sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
>> +
>> +description:
>> + The QCOM QPIC-SPI-NAND flash controller is an extended version of
>> + the QCOM QPIC NAND flash controller. It can work both in serial
>> + and parallel mode. It supports typical SPI-NAND page cache
>> + operations in single, dual or quad IO mode with pipelined ECC
>> + encoding/decoding using the QPIC ECC HW engine.
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> + - $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-controller.yaml#
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + enum:
>> + - qcom,spi-qpic-snand
>
> Recently it turned out that Qualcomm generic compatibles are not
> generic... That was odd, but to me it is a clear signal that something
> should not be called generic if it is not generic enough.
>
> Please switch to soc-specific compatibles (and drop my reviewed-by, so
> this will appear in my review queue).
Ok , will add in next revision.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists