[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZvJj3butL8FYeXpi@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:01:49 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"rds-devel@....oracle.com" <rds-devel@....oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [MAINLINE 0/2] Enable DIM for legacy ULPs and use it in RDS
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 06:51:18AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 09:46:06AM +0000, Haakon Bugge wrote:
> > > I would much prefer if you could move RDS off that horrible API finally
> > > instead of investing more effort into it and making it more complicated.
> >
> > ib_alloc_cq() and family does not support arming the CQ with the IB_CQ_SOLICITED flag, which RDS uses.
>
> Then work on supporting it. RDS and SMC are the only users, so one
> of the maintainers needs to drive it.
I took a quick look at what it would take, and adding IB_CQ_SOLICITED
support to the cq API looks pretty trivial, you'll just need to pass
it to ib_cq_pool_get by adding a new argument and the pass it
down to __ib_alloc_cq. So yes, please get started at moving RDS out
of the stone age.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists