[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVEfPtwps0A29WvHcwgo3f+3nTBiGn1PFxoYy1dxPsUMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:48:02 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] m68k: Define NR_CPUS
Hi David,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 9:34 AM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 24.09.24 01:56, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > v2: Instead of trying to make SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS depend on the
> > existence of NR_CPUS, define NR_CPUS for m68k.
>
> Okay, looks like we're cleaning up CONFIG_NR_CPUS for good.
>
> I'm back from conference travel tomorrow; I'll then throw in the following
> into cross compilers and fixup any other arch that needs attention:
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/threads.h b/include/linux/threads.h
> index 1674a471b0b4..e31715e6746b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/threads.h
> +++ b/include/linux/threads.h
> @@ -13,8 +13,7 @@
> * bit of memory. Use nr_cpu_ids instead of this except for static bitmaps.
> */
> #ifndef CONFIG_NR_CPUS
> -/* FIXME: This should be fixed in the arch's Kconfig */
> -#define CONFIG_NR_CPUS 1
> +#error "CONFIG_NR_CPUS not defined"
> #endif
>
> /* Places which use this should consider cpumask_var_t. */
This is gonna trigger on almost all architectures if CONFIG_SMP=n.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists