[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vghktkih6pdjrui7sjs2gn2elfcdlplh37ahzcm2xnqin3rh4g@cck4xniyourm>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:22:40 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@...ft.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Petr Benes <petr.benes@...ft.com>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Herburger <gregor.herburger@...tq-group.com>, Hiago De Franco <hiago.franco@...adex.com>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>, Joao Paulo Goncalves <joao.goncalves@...adex.com>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for new IMX8MP based board
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 05:14:13PM +0200, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this series adds support for a new member in our IOTA platform.
> The board is based on the i.MX8MP SoC. The first two patches
> add support for most of the board functionality except USB Type-C
> port and some other minor things.
>
> [PATCH 3] adds new device tree binding for a Diodes Incorporated
> PI5USB30213A Type-C Controller and [PATCH 4] enables that port on
> the IOTA2 Lumpy board.
>
> We also wrote a driver for that Type-C port controller. I would like
> to get that driver upstream as well but I expect it will take much
> more iterations and effort to get it into mainline-ready shape so
> I intentionally excluded it from this series. AFAIK it should not
> be a problem to accept a device tree binding for a HW that does not
> have a driver in the kernel yet.
It's unusual but okay. It will be however more difficult for you - any
changes in the binding in the future (when writing driver) will be
rejected on basis of breaking ABI, even if Linux does not use that ABI.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists