[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba0bc896-41ad-4f1d-9218-fc5a44add422@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:01:06 +0530
From: Mahadevan P <quic_mahap@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <robdclark@...il.com>, <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, <sean@...rly.run>,
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, <airlied@...il.com>,
<daniel@...ll.ch>, <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
<mripard@...nel.org>, <tzimmermann@...e.de>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <danila@...xyga.com>,
<bigfoot@...ssfun.cn>, <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
<mailingradian@...il.com>, <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>, <quic_jmadiset@...cinc.com>,
<quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm/msm/dpu: Add SA8775P support
On 9/24/2024 5:46 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 04:42:02PM GMT, Mahadevan P wrote:
>> On 9/12/2024 1:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 12:44:36PM GMT, Mahadevan wrote:
>>>> Add definitions for the display hardware used on the
>>>> Qualcomm SA8775P platform.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mahadevan <quic_mahap@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_4_sa8775p.h | 485 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 3 +-
>>>> .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 3 +-
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 3 +-
>>>> 4 files changed, 491 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_4_sa8775p.h
>>>>
> [...]
>
>>>> +static const struct dpu_intf_cfg sa8775p_intf[] = {
>>>> + {
>>>> + .name = "intf_0", .id = INTF_0,
>>>> + .base = 0x34000, .len = 0x280,
>>>> + .features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> + .type = INTF_DP,
>>>> + .controller_id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0,
>>>> + .prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> + .intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 24),
>>>> + .intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 25),
>>>> + }, {
>>>> + .name = "intf_1", .id = INTF_1,
>>>> + .base = 0x35000, .len = 0x300,
>>>> + .features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> + .type = INTF_DSI,
>>>> + .controller_id = MSM_DSI_CONTROLLER_0,
>>>> + .prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> + .intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 26),
>>>> + .intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 27),
>>>> + .intr_tear_rd_ptr = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_INTF1_TEAR_INTR, 2),
>>>> + }, {
>>>> + .name = "intf_2", .id = INTF_2,
>>>> + .base = 0x36000, .len = 0x300,
>>>> + .features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> + .type = INTF_DSI,
>>>> + .controller_id = MSM_DSI_CONTROLLER_1,
>>>> + .prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> + .intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 28),
>>>> + .intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 29),
>>>> + .intr_tear_rd_ptr = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_INTF2_TEAR_INTR, 2),
>>>> + }, {
>>>> + .name = "intf_3", .id = INTF_3,
>>>> + .base = 0x37000, .len = 0x280,
>>>> + .features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> + .type = INTF_NONE,
>>>> + .controller_id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0, /* pair with intf_0 for DP MST */
>>>> + .prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> + .intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 30),
>>>> + .intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 31),
>>>> + }, {
>>>> + .name = "intf_4", .id = INTF_4,
>>>> + .base = 0x38000, .len = 0x280,
>>>> + .features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> + .type = INTF_DP,
>>>> + .controller_id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1,
>>>> + .prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> + .intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 20),
>>>> + .intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 21),
>>>> + }, {
>>> Where is intf_5 ?
>>
>> intf_5 of base address 0x39000 is not supported on this target.
> Not supported by whom?
In sa8775p mdss architecture intf_5 is not present. So we are not adding
in SW too.
>
>>
>>>> + .name = "intf_6", .id = INTF_6,
>>>> + .base = 0x3A000, .len = 0x280,
>>>> + .features = INTF_SC7280_MASK,
>>>> + .type = INTF_NONE,
>>>> + .controller_id = MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0, /* pair with intf_0 for DP MST */
>>>> + .prog_fetch_lines_worst_case = 24,
>>>> + .intr_underrun = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 17),
>>>> + .intr_vsync = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 16),
>>>> + }, {
> [skipped]
>
>>>> @@ -1464,6 +1464,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dpu_dt_match[] = {
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8250_cfg, },
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8350_cfg, },
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8450_cfg, },
>>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-dpu", .data = &dpu_sa8775p_cfg, },
>>> Wrong sorting order
>>
>> Sure will move below sm8650-dpu.
> What makes you think that in a dictionary sa8775p comes after sm8650?
Will update according to alphabetical order in next patch.
>
>>
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8550-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8550_cfg, },
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8650-dpu", .data = &dpu_sm8650_cfg, },
>>>> { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-dpu", .data = &dpu_x1e80100_cfg, },
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists