linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add Everest ES7243E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZvKxLPQ1fcF8JBU4@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:31:40 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Igor Prusov <ivprusov@...utedevices.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...utedevices.com, prusovigor@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: Add Everest ES7243E

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 06:41:07PM +0300, Igor Prusov wrote:

> +  clocks:
> +    minItems: 2
> +    maxItems: 2

> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: sclk
> +      - const: lrclk

This is quite weird and doesn't seem to correspond to the chip datasheet
at:

    http://www.everest-semi.com/pdf/ES7243%20PB.pdf
    https://www.pawpaw.cn/media/documents/2022-04/ES7243E_DS_pawpaw%E6%9C%A8%E7%93%9C%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80.pdf

The SCLK and LRCLK appear to be the bit and frame sync clocks which
would not normally be exposed directly via the clock API (so this is
probably not going to be joined up with whatever SoC it's connected to).
On the other hand there *is* a MCLK which would much more normally be
represented in the DT bindings and isn't represented here or managed by
the driver.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)