linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: broadcom: Add missing required fields

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6723d91c-ac15-436e-878c-2d6fc1aac5e2@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:38:50 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
 Karan Sanghavi <karansanghvi98@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Anup <anupnewsmail@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dts: broadcom: Add missing required fields

On 9/25/24 09:39, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Karan,
> 
> Am 25.09.24 um 18:14 schrieb Karan Sanghavi:
>> Added below mentioned required fields
>>    1. interrupt-controller
>>    2. #interrupt-cells
>> in the bcm2711.dtsi file for the
>> interrupt-controller@...00000 block as defined in the
>> bindings/interrupt-controller/brcm,bcm2836-l1-intc.yaml.
>> This issue was noticed while compiling the dtb file
>> for broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dts file.
>> After including the above fields in the dtsi file
>> interrupt-conntroller error was resolved.
> looks like you made the same mistake like me [1]. This change breaks
> boot of Raspberry Pi 4 [2].
> 
> There are a lot of DT schema warnings to fix, but this doesn't belong to
> the trivial ones.

Including the #interrupt-cells would not have a functional impact 
however, and we ought to be able to do that.

The 'interrupt-controller' property presence means that the controller 
will be picked up by of_irq_init() and that is was causes problems for 
people testing this. Stefan, do you know if the VPU firmware 
removes/inserts that property to tell Linux which interrupt controller 
(bcm2836-l1-intc or ARM GIC) to use or does it make use of the "status" 
property which would be the canonical way about doing that?

Thanks!
-- 
Florian