lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240925093538.GZ275077@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:35:38 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
	Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: Use common error handling code in
 update_property_block()

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:20:45AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>  out_unlock:
> >>  	mutex_unlock(&xd->lock);
> >>  	mutex_unlock(&xdomain_lock);
> >> +	return;
> >> +
> >> +out_free_dir:
> >> +	tb_property_free_dir(dir);
> >> +	goto out_unlock;
> >
> > No way, this kind of spaghetti is really hard to follow.
> 
> Under which circumstances would you follow advice more from the section
> “7) Centralized exiting of functions” (according to a well-known information source)?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v6.11#n526
> 
> How do you think about to increase the application of scope-based resource management?

It is fine to use goto as it is described in the document you linked but
this what you are doing is certainly not fine, at least in the code I'm
maintaining:

out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&xd->lock);
  	mutex_unlock(&xdomain_lock);
	return;

out_free_dir:
	tb_property_free_dir(dir);
	goto out_unlock;

This "goto out_unlock" adds another goto to upwards which makes it
really hard to follow because the flow is not anymore just downwards.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ