[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<172725843003.522662.2025610414872346543.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 10:00:30 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wander.lairson@...il.com, bgrech@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: use raw_spinlock_t in ringbuf
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:06:59 -0300 you wrote:
> From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander.lairson@...il.com>
>
> The function __bpf_ringbuf_reserve is invoked from a tracepoint, which
> disables preemption. Using spinlock_t in this context can lead to a
> "sleep in atomic" warning in the RT variant. This issue is illustrated
> in the example below:
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- bpf: use raw_spinlock_t in ringbuf
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/8b62645b09f8
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists