[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cf24b3-5ddd-4532-b186-dd1dcc62f712@leemhuis.info>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:56:02 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Tamim Khan <tamim@...etak.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: resource: Skip IRQ override on Asus Vivobook Go
E1404GAB
[CCing Hans]
On 05.09.24 12:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 05.09.24 11:51, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 03.09.24 03:43, Tamim Khan wrote:
>>> Like other Asus Vivobooks, the Asus Vivobook Go E1404GAB has a DSDT
>>> that describes IRQ 1 as ActiveLow, while the kernel overrides to Edge_High.
>>> This override prevents the internal keyboard from working. This patch fixes
>>> this problem by adding this laptop to the table that prevents the kernel from
>>> overriding the IRQ.
>>>
>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219212
>>
>> Thx for that. FWIW, I by chance noticed another such report about the
>> E1404GA: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219224
>
> TWIMC, shortly after sending this mail I noticed there is another request
> for a quirk that was send to the list, bug afaics fall through the
> cracks. See here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1226760b-4699-4529-bf57-6423938157a3@wanadoo.fr/
>
> It afaics add a X1704VAP:
>
> {
> /* Asus Vivobook X1704V */
> .matches = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."),
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "X1704VAP"),
> },
> },
FWIW, noticed another such report, this time about the B2502CVA:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217760#c12
"""
> adding this section to file drivers/acpi/resource.c helped; if someone could do an official patch it would be great :-|
>
> {
> /* Asus ExpertBook B2502CVA */
> .matches = {
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."),
> DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "B2502CVA"),
> },
"""
This is not a regression, but given how frequently I notice these issues
please as a bystander allow me to ask: is there maybe some way to
improve the situation so that we do not have to add all these and likely
many other Asus Laptops to that file?
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists