linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] x86/bugs: Use code segment selector for VERW operand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240926165656.4ato6lx4omwiy6sv@desk>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:56:56 -0700
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Robert Gill <rtgill82@...il.com>,
	Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...tonmail.com>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
	antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com,
	daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] x86/bugs: Use code segment selector for VERW
 operand

On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 05:28:05PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 26/09/2024 5:10 pm, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 04:52:53PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> >>> index e18a6aaf414c..4228a1fd2c2e 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> >>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> >>> @@ -318,14 +318,21 @@
> >>>   /*
> >>>    * Macro to execute VERW instruction that mitigate transient data sampling
> >>>    * attacks such as MDS. On affected systems a microcode update overloaded VERW
> >>> - * instruction to also clear the CPU buffers. VERW clobbers CFLAGS.ZF. Using %cs
> >>> - * to reference VERW operand avoids a #GP fault for an arbitrary user %ds in
> >>> - * 32-bit mode.
> >>> + * instruction to also clear the CPU buffers. VERW clobbers CFLAGS.ZF.
> >>>    *
> >>>    * Note: Only the memory operand variant of VERW clears the CPU buffers.
> >>>    */
> >>>   .macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
> >>> -	ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw %cs:_ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> >>> +	ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw _ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> >> You should drop _ASM_RIP here and direclty use (%rip). This way, you also
> >> won't need __stringify:
> >>
> >> ALTERNATIVE "", "verw mds_verw_sel(%rip)", X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> >>
> >>> +#else
> >>> +	/*
> >>> +	 * In 32bit mode, the memory operand must be a %cs reference. The data
> >>> +	 * segments may not be usable (vm86 mode), and the stack segment may not
> >>> +	 * be flat (ESPFIX32).
> >>> +	 */
> >>> +	ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw %cs:mds_verw_sel), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> >> Also here, no need for __stringify:
> >>
> >> ALTERNATIVE "", "verw %cs:mds_verw_sel", X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> >>
> >> This is in fact what Andrew proposed in his review.
> > Thanks for pointing out, I completely missed that part. Below is how it
> > looks like with stringify gone:
> >
> > --- >8 ---
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86/bugs: Use code segment selector for VERW operand
> >
> > Robert Gill reported below #GP in 32-bit mode when dosemu software was
> > executing vm86() system call:
> >
> >   general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> >   CPU: 4 PID: 4610 Comm: dosemu.bin Not tainted 6.6.21-gentoo-x86 #1
> >   Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge 1950/0H723K, BIOS 2.7.0 10/30/2010
> >   EIP: restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
> >   EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
> >   ESI: 00000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ff8affdc
> >   DS: 0000 ES: 0000 FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010046
> >   CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00c2101c CR3: 04b6d000 CR4: 000406d0
> >   Call Trace:
> >    show_regs+0x70/0x78
> >    die_addr+0x29/0x70
> >    exc_general_protection+0x13c/0x348
> >    exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
> >    handle_exception+0x14d/0x14d
> >    exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
> >    restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
> >    exc_bounds+0x98/0x98
> >    restore_all_switch_stack+0xbe/0xcf
> >
> > This only happens in 32-bit mode when VERW based mitigations like MDS/RFDS
> > are enabled. This is because segment registers with an arbitrary user value
> > can result in #GP when executing VERW. Intel SDM vol. 2C documents the
> > following behavior for VERW instruction:
> >
> >   #GP(0) - If a memory operand effective address is outside the CS, DS, ES,
> > 	   FS, or GS segment limit.
> >
> > CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS macro executes VERW instruction before returning to user
> > space. Use %cs selector to reference VERW operand. This ensures VERW will
> > not #GP for an arbitrary user %ds.
> >
> > Fixes: a0e2dab44d22 ("x86/entry_32: Add VERW just before userspace transition")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.10+
> > Reported-by: Robert Gill <rtgill82@...il.com>
> > Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218707
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8c77ccfd-d561-45a1-8ed5-6b75212c7a58@leemhuis.info/
> > Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Suggested-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> > index ff5f1ecc7d1e..96b410b1d4e8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> > @@ -323,7 +323,16 @@
> >   * Note: Only the memory operand variant of VERW clears the CPU buffers.
> >   */
> >  .macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
> > -	ALTERNATIVE "", __stringify(verw _ASM_RIP(mds_verw_sel)), X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +	ALTERNATIVE "", "verw mds_verw_sel(%rip)", X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> > +#else
> > +	/*
> > +	 * In 32bit mode, the memory operand must be a %cs reference. The data
> > +	 * segments may not be usable (vm86 mode), and the stack segment may not
> > +	 * be flat (ESPFIX32).
> > +	 */
> > +	ALTERNATIVE "", "verw %cs:mds_verw_sel", X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF
> > +#endif
> 
> You should also delete _ASM_RIP() as you're removing the only user of it.

Can we? I see that __svm_vcpu_run() and __vmx_vcpu_run() are using _ASM_RIP().

> But yes, with that, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> FWIW.

Thanks.