[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZvURMxKGilu_XBvH@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:45:55 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
"open list:SPI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Microchip (AT91) SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: atmel-quadspi: Avoid overwriting delay register
settings
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 09:25:10AM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> This is somewhat embarrassing, because the patch was already applied
> to master. Should it be reverted, then I would send a v2 of the
> series? Or should I send a quick fixup?
A quick fixup is better.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists