[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZvTUo_nbr_gKaJrs@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 20:27:31 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
Guilherme Amadio <amadio@...too.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@...gle.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Shenlin Liang <liangshenlin@...incomputing.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Chen Pei <cp0613@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dima Kogan <dima@...retsauce.net>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/11] perf build: Rename PERF_HAVE_DWARF_REGS to
PERF_HAVE_LIBDW_REGS
On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 09:04:18AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> The name dwarf can imply libunwind support, whereas
> PERF_HAVE_DWARF_REGS is only enabled with libdw support. Rename to
> make it clearer there is a libdw connection.
While it only covers libdw, I think the idea of this macro is whether
the arch has register mappings defined in DWARF standard. So I think
it's better to keep the name for this case.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists