linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5.10] xfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024092725-chamber-compel-10b5@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 08:52:37 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kuntal Nayak <kuntal.nayak@...adcom.com>
Cc: leah.rumancik@...il.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ajay.kaher@...adcom.com,
	alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com, vasavi.sirnapalli@...adcom.com,
	lei lu <llfamsec@...il.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.10] xfs: add bounds checking to
 xlog_recover_process_data

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:39:56PM -0700, Kuntal Nayak wrote:
> From: lei lu <llfamsec@...il.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit fb63435b7c7dc112b1ae1baea5486e0a6e27b196 ]

Also, what is the ordering here?  Should I just guess?