lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA4K+2aGYuRZW6prUi53vcEYhuCf4WvGEj384E-Ut-OJEm6wkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:47:54 -0700
From: Kuntal Nayak <kuntal.nayak@...adcom.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: leah.rumancik@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	ajay.kaher@...adcom.com, alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com, 
	vasavi.sirnapalli@...adcom.com, lei lu <llfamsec@...il.com>, 
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>, "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, 
	Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.10] xfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process_data

Thank you, Greg, for getting back to me. Following is the order for patches,

1. xfs: No need for inode number error injection in __xfs_dir3_data_check
2. xfs: don't walk off the end of a directory data block
3. xfs: add bounds checking to xlog_recover_process_data


Hello xfs-team, could you kindly assist me in reviewing the 3 patches
listed above for LTS v5.10?

------
Sincerely,
Kuntal

On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 1:00 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:39:56PM -0700, Kuntal Nayak wrote:
> > From: lei lu <llfamsec@...il.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit fb63435b7c7dc112b1ae1baea5486e0a6e27b196 ]
>
> Also, what is the ordering here?  Should I just guess?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ