[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea008e5e-be22-4a59-9243-682be313fea2@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 21:17:45 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vitalii Mordan <mordan@...ras.ru>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
Vadim Mutilin <mutilin@...ras.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] stmmac: dwmac-intel-plat: remove redundant
check dwmac->data in probe
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 09:39:26PM +0300, Vitalii Mordan wrote:
> The driver’s compatibility with devices is confirmed earlier in
> platform_match(). Since reaching probe means the device is valid,
> the extra check can be removed to simplify the code.
>
> dwmac->data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> - if (dwmac->data) {
You say this cannot fail, but my guess is, there are static code
analysers which cannot determine it cannot fail. As a result, those
developers blindly following bots are going to want to test the return
value from device_get_match_data().
You might want to prevent such patches by adding a comment:
/* This cannot fail because....
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists