[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZvsztS6wMMFuXjSz@google.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 16:26:45 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/test: perf test 86 fails on s390 repo linux-next
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:30:39PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> On 9/27/24 00:42, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 02:57:18PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
> >> Command perf test 86 fails on s390 using linux-next repository:
> >> # perf test -F 86
> >> ping 868299 [007] 28248.013596: probe_libc:inet_pton_1: (3ff95948020)
> >> 3ff95948020 inet_pton+0x0 (inlined)
> >> 3ff9595e6e7 text_to_binary_address+0x1007 (inlined)
> >> 3ff9595e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)
> >> FAIL: expected backtrace entry \
> >> "main\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$"
> >> got "3ff9595e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)"
> >> 86: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : FAILED!
> >> #
> >>
> >> The root cause is a new stack layout, some functions have been added
> >> as seen below. Add text_to_binary_address and friends to the
> >> list of expected functions.
> >>
> >> # perf script | tac | grep -m1 '^ping' -B9 | tac
> >> ping 866856 [007] 25979.494921: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ff8ec48020)
> >> 3ff8ec48020 inet_pton+0x0 (inlined)
> >> 3ff8ec5e6e7 text_to_binary_address+0x1007 (inlined)
> >> 3ff8ec5e6e7 gaih_inet+0x1007 (inlined)
> >> 3ff8ec5e6e7 getaddrinfo+0x1007 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
> >> 2aa3fe04bf5 main+0xff5 (/usr/bin/ping)
> >> 3ff8eb34a5b __libc_start_call_main+0x8b (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
> >> 3ff8eb34b5d __libc_start_main@...BC_2.2+0xad (inlined)
> >> 2aa3fe06a1f [unknown] (/usr/bin/ping)
> >
> > Is it because of a kernel change? What about old kernels then?
> >
> >>
> >> #
> >>
> >> Output after:
> >> # perf test -F 86
> >> 86: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping : Ok
> >> #
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
> >> index f38c8ead0b03..bc6e2fe1d999 100755
> >> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/record+probe_libc_inet_pton.sh
> >> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() {
> >> case "$(uname -m)" in
> >> s390x)
> >> eventattr='call-graph=dwarf,max-stack=4'
> >> + echo "text_to_binary_address\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
> >> + echo "gaih_inet\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
> >
> > Is it possible to make it this part conditional and only have it for the
> > new kernels?
>
> I think this is more related to glibc and has nothing to do with the kernel version.
> It happened after I did a dnf update.
Ok, then I'm afraid fixing this would break others with old glibc.
Can you please update the regex to cover both cases?
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists