[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_RzfZ0LVTBGpyMj5X1GTgdzhw=zx=E_zMSFNmNSks91jBMGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:14:53 -0300
From: Guilherme Giácomo Simões <trintaeoitogc@...il.com>
To: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
Cc: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>, rafael@...nel.org, ojeda@...nel.org,
alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
mcgrof@...nel.org, russ.weight@...ux.dev, dakr@...hat.com,
a.hindborg@...nel.org,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] device: rust: change the name function
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com> writes:
>
>
> On 29.09.2024 17:35, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> > links may become stale,
> > so please do not link to anything.
>
> This sounds a little too general to me ;)
>
> I mean we link a lot, using the 'Link' tag even in patches.
>
> For example the mailing list archive has the 'permalink' button and
> Zulip has the 'Copy link to message' button I think can be used.
>
>
> > Lastly, I can’t see a diff anywhere.
>
> Yes, I was confused by that, too. But I wonder if just the numbering is
> wrong? I.e. if [PATCH 1/2] was intended to be the cover letter 0/1 and
> the [PATCH 2/2] was intended to be the actual patch 1/1? Just a hint :)
>
> Best regards
>
> Dirk
I can resend the patch with the message commit fixed and the correct numeration.
Thanks for your comment in my patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists