[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51fe3ee3-0b81-418d-b05f-626dbcea4f57@de.bosch.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 06:33:33 +0200
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Guilherme Giácomo Simões <trintaeoitogc@...il.com>
CC: <rafael@...nel.org>, <ojeda@...nel.org>, <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
<boqun.feng@...il.com>, <gary@...yguo.net>, <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
<benno.lossin@...ton.me>, <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
<russ.weight@...ux.dev>, <dakr@...hat.com>, <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] device: rust: change the name function
On 29.09.2024 17:35, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> links may become stale,
> so please do not link to anything.
This sounds a little too general to me ;)
I mean we link a lot, using the 'Link' tag even in patches.
For example the mailing list archive has the 'permalink' button and
Zulip has the 'Copy link to message' button I think can be used.
> Lastly, I can’t see a diff anywhere.
Yes, I was confused by that, too. But I wonder if just the numbering is
wrong? I.e. if [PATCH 1/2] was intended to be the cover letter 0/1 and
the [PATCH 2/2] was intended to be the actual patch 1/1? Just a hint :)
Best regards
Dirk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists