linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] device: rust: change the name function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51fe3ee3-0b81-418d-b05f-626dbcea4f57@de.bosch.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 06:33:33 +0200
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
	Guilherme Giácomo Simões <trintaeoitogc@...il.com>
CC: <rafael@...nel.org>, <ojeda@...nel.org>, <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
	<boqun.feng@...il.com>, <gary@...yguo.net>, <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
	<benno.lossin@...ton.me>, <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	<russ.weight@...ux.dev>, <dakr@...hat.com>, <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] device: rust: change the name function

On 29.09.2024 17:35, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> links may become stale,
> so please do not link to anything.

This sounds a little too general to me ;)

I mean we link a lot, using the 'Link' tag even in patches.

For example the mailing list archive has the 'permalink' button and 
Zulip has the 'Copy link to message' button I think can be used.

> Lastly, I can’t see a diff anywhere.

Yes, I was confused by that, too. But I wonder if just the numbering is 
wrong? I.e. if [PATCH 1/2] was intended to be the cover letter 0/1 and 
the [PATCH 2/2] was intended to be the actual patch 1/1? Just a hint :)

Best regards

Dirk