[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241001210200.GC1369530@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 18:02:00 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index calculation
for AmpereOne
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 01:47:24PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 1e9952ca989f..de9f14293485 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -235,6 +235,11 @@ static inline u32 arm_smmu_strtab_l2_idx(u32 sid)
> return sid % STRTAB_NUM_L2_STES;
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned int arm_smmu_strtab_max_sid(unsigned int sid_bits)
> +{
Can we take the smmu struct here instead of the int?
But yes, this looks OK
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists