[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb8461b5-4471-4927-a585-b62d05819f79@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 14:32:52 -0700
From: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, will@...nel.org,
robin.murphy@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index calculation
for AmpereOne
On 10/1/24 2:02 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 01:47:24PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
>> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
>> index 1e9952ca989f..de9f14293485 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
>> @@ -235,6 +235,11 @@ static inline u32 arm_smmu_strtab_l2_idx(u32 sid)
>> return sid % STRTAB_NUM_L2_STES;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline unsigned int arm_smmu_strtab_max_sid(unsigned int sid_bits)
>> +{
> Can we take the smmu struct here instead of the int?
No problem.
>
> But yes, this looks OK
Thank you.
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists